DC KICKS IN "THE NEW 52"! 52 WEEKS IN A YEAR! 52 BOOKS IN A MONTH! 365 DAYS IN A YEAR! 206 BONES IN THE ADULT HUMAN BODY! WHATEVER!
Comics, like all art and music, is an ongoing discussion of the form. There are comics that move the conversation forward, comics that hold it in place, and comics that pull it backwards. I would put this, Justice League number 1, in the latter category. A comic that pushes you and the medium in reverse. The cover alone, too ugly to place at the top of this post, gives no message of a bright new era in the DC universe. This is the song of stagnation. Justice League, the flagship book for the revolution, got the most hype for it's costume redesigns which seem to center around higher collars. Yes, higher collars. Jim Lee, out on the golf course, saw a young man wearing a polo shirt with the collar up and thought to himself; "That. That right there. That's 2011. I can already taste the new readers."
The biggest reason I can think of for DC comics to reboot it's whole line is the need for stories that easily translate to movies. They want simple tales of heroes meeting heroes. Powerful beings, not yet friends, beating the shit out of each other, questioning one another's loyalty to the cause and eventually staring up at the moon from a romantic rooftop, shoulder to shoulder, united in the face of some great evil. Hollywood can't mine the ancient and wacky stock of DC's infancy for solid origin stories because they would unearth Batman meeting Krypto the Superdog and today's blood thirsty movie going audience just won't buy it. So instead of creating a separate Ultimate Universe like Marvel did to forward a think tank for big screen enterprises, DC threw everything back into the blender and we get,
Alzheimers. We get narrative Alzheimers. We get DC on track to retrofit every story they ever told. And here I thought computers were making us smarter. But there's no No-Prize in starting from scratch. It's about building bridges from unbelievable situation to unbelievable situation. That's the basis of universe building comics. Back to the comic let's see what happens next to Green Lantern and The Batman,
Ok, fake out, that's not what happens next. That second page is from 2005's All Star Batman. The Frank Miller/Jim Lee atrocity that was so wrong it couldn't even curse-word it's way past the finish line and drowned itself in masochistic bile by issue 10. But it is also an example of another recent Batman meets Green Lantern issue drawn by Jim Lee. The man must wake up thinking he's living in Groundhog day. But I'm psyched that Jim Lee put Jim Lee (as he now runs the DC show) on the new centerpiece title even when the last two projects he has been involved with, All Star Batman and Wildcats, just quit mid or not even mid story. And it's unfair to compare All Star Batman to this new Justice League. Geoff Johns is a finely tuned writing machine with a deep understanding of his characters and he's a world away from the twisted propaganda of Frank Miller. But what both stories have is a new beginning for major characters and a celebrated macho flare. But maybe macho flare is just Batman where ever you find him. And Justice League, instead of having All Star Batman's cast of half naked battered woman, just chose to have no woman at all. Playing it safe. Bringing in new readers?
I was introduced to Geoff John through his writing on Justice Society. It had a cast of characters I didn't really care or know all that much about but Johns made them interesting. Here in Justice League between Batman and Green Lantern are two characters I do care about, and Johns makes them, well, uninteresting. Sure, it is only one issue deep into his run but I can almost see the stick'em note above his desk that says, "dumb it down", next to one that says "Teenagers". When you are dealing with super heroes, dumbing it down brings you(and them) very close to catatonic. Now every comics reader wants the level of storytelling in their favorite books to age with him/her. When I was 16 I wanted to read what I thought was cool, and now 22 years later I still want to read what I think is cool. How can an industry indulge in the needs of one aging customer? What about today's new 16 year old? What I didn't know 22 years ago but I pretend to know now is that good superhero comics have always been written for adults, but with a simplicity of delivery. You don't and you can't write comics for teenagers.
Jim Lee still turns out a solid easy to read product. A little craggier around the edges than he used to be, slightly rushed perhaps to get this book out monthly, but he still draws male buttocks like a true champ. Him and Marc Silvestri, "The Buttock Kings". I was looking forward to Grant Morrison and Lee's run on Wildcats. If it hadn't been abandoned it could have had the push and pull of two different minds creating a mainstream yet stirring series. JL feels like there might be too much agreement between creators. No tension. Nothing new to learn from each other. It's just, "hey man, let's bring in new readers. Yeah dude, let's play it safe."
Oh yeah, one other thing on the costume redesigns, the case of Young Superman's mysterious new armor?
Now DC's mammoth reboot isn't all mediocrity, in fact I would call it a conceptual success as I have bought way more DC titles this September already in 2 weeks than I normally would all month(Though I also bought way less since they announced the reboot than I normally would in the last couple months). But so far, Batgirl, OMAC, Action Comics, to name a few. And there are some titles, specifically the B-E list characters that could be or could become great. Like Swamp Thing, Frankenstein, and specifically Animal Man.
Travel, a strange artist(with a cool name) turns out a striking issue 1 cover, (his Loki mini series covers were also well designed)
but certain interior pages look bare to the point of having to mutter, "oh this is one of those artists who can't draw backgrounds".
It's a weird thing, the figure and the background and whether they intersect or not, but I think it is a thing that artists struggle with. Schooled artists take "figure drawing class" but I don't recall an emphasis on "figure in relation to setting" drawing classes. It makes one wonder if as an artist the relationship between your figure and your background, integration versus separation, mimics your relationship with the world in general. But just when you start thinking Travel wants people to live in a white bubble he hits you with this...
...and you just don't care whether he walks in the yard with bare feet or shoes on. You just dig into it. (And you wonder if Travel is looking at Kentaro Miura's insane endlessly creative Berserk manga from Dark Horse)
God I hope he is. I hope everyone is. All in all, Travel Foreman's layouts are surprising, daring, at times nonsensical, sometimes a failure but most times interesting. His line, or possibly Dan Green's inks, has variety and vitality. I'm excited to see Travel with an ongoing series, evolving, getting stronger and more daring as he goes. For the Animal Man infomaniacs, the character was first seen in 1965 as simply Buddy Baker in issue 180 of Strange Adventures.
Buddy moved into a higher profile position in the 1988 Vertigo Animal Man series by Grant Morrison. I personally came too late for Morrison's run but just on time for some horrifyingly beautiful work by writer Jamie Delano and Artist Steve Pugh. Brian Bolland does this astounding cover. This. Cover. Rules!
If memory serves me this 1993 storyline has Buddy Baker dead and attempting to travel back through an assortment of animal forms and mutations to his original human shape. Meanwhile a crazed Uncle Dudley is assaulting his son, Cliff. Buddy's daughter Maxine is the voice of trust on this next juicy Steve Pugh page, where she tries to set up a rendezvous with Buddy's wife, Ellen.
Animal Man has always had a wealth of creative talents behind it, and has always been a playground for experimentation. Shamefully I haven't read the Morrison run that began the Vertigo title, but I plan too. Oh I plan too. Here's hoping the new title keeps up the enlightened weirdness. We need it.
Now before we move on to more reviews we have a final word on Animal Man and Justice League in this special feature, a visit with guest professional comic book reviewer Anu King! (with bonus appearances by Rahul(spiderman), Lucia, Yesah and Hunter)
Thanks Anu! We'll keep on the lookout for "Amulet". And now, on with the reviews!
THE NEW AVENGERS ANNUAL 1 2011
And now to the Marvel Universe! In this "annual", Simon Williams, a.k.a. Wonder Man, continues his Brian Bendis scripted spiral downward into hate and revenge, a subplot that wanders into the Avengers titles on occasion. The idea that Wonder Man has turned on the Avengers could be a good one, and about 5 pages into this I thought we had a "The Boys" rip off on our hands set in the Marvel U. And I wish that's what this was. I wish there was one teaspoon of intelligence behind Wonder Man's plot a.k.a. this comic's plot. But no. The Avengers cause violence and therefore Wonder Man will bring violence upon them to teach them a lesson because he is going crazy or something, possibly due to his Ionic energies. By the close of the book the mansion is destroyed yet again and the New Avengers lie unconscious, defeated. Tomorrow they will wake up with a fist induced hang over and nothing consequential will have happened. Wonder Man and his gang of second rate dudes have defeated Wolverine, Luke Cage, Spiderman, The Thing, Ms. Marvel, Doctor Strange, Jessica Jones and Mockingbird and now gaze upwards at Avengers tower where the more powerful Avengers live. The book's a dud. A dull fight scene between dullards, a joke really. Line up for it folks. Gabriele Dell'otto paints a great cover though, but turns in his most lackluster work to date for the interior.
It's some of that "pencil only/digital inks" stuff superhero books have been delivering like the work of artist Ron Garney over in Wolverine and Ultimate Captain America. It all just ends up looking soft, blurry and rushed. Reads kind of like "Sorry, couldn't afford an inker". I know I know, "raw, untamed pencil". Yeah well, you wish. There's enough background on this raw untamed Garney Ultimate Captain America page to at least let you know where they might be.... the muddy jungle. It looks kind of cool small, not so cool bigger if you click on it.
If they really want to do some "pencil only" work these guys should check out CF's Powr Mastrs.
If they really want to do some "pencil only" work these guys should check out CF's Powr Mastrs.
These notes scrawled on the back of a Powr Mastrs page might give some insight into what CF is looking at.
Hey he's looking at Berserk! So should we! again!
and now, on with the reviews!
Let's break from all the manliness for a quick moment and look at Aidan Koch while we are in pencil mode. Having read a few reviews of last year's The Whale I came away with two thoughts. People seem to like her other books better, and people seem convinced she is taking a walk near the beach with her dog. Well, it's not her dog. It's a dog that is visiting her much like the seal is visiting her much like the ghost of the lost loved one "S" is visiting her. It is such a overt and fleeting visitation that the dog is even named "Casper" which translates to "friendly ghost". I thought this small story was wonderful. A floating moment of sadness, unable to drift out to sea.
And now onto the final barely a review!
GANTZ 18
Gantz is on a bi-monthly schedule now from Dark Horse publishers and I think it, above all others, is the book I look forward to the most. Artist/writer Hiroya Oku provides us with a thrilling sci-fi action drama set in modern day Japan. Ultraviolent, disturbing, grotesque, surprising and genuinely weird this tale is of a group of reincarnated citizens involved in some sort of hunting and fighting game that takes place in public in Tokyo yet is invisible to people uninvolved(though it can still be lethal to them). Chasing aliens, fighting monsters, staying alive, and in many cases getting dismembered or killed permanently is the basic story, all set against the mystery of "who knows about and is controlling this game?". It's an impeccable book. And issue 18 is specifically action packed. No room for the protagonists to ponder their situation or fantasize about magazine models in this one. Some people may be turned off by Gantz's computer generated art or its blood spattered shock or it's gratuitous nudity or it's sometimes jumpy narrative structure or the fact that certain characters basically look like others except their hair is an inch longer but I say it rules and as for the over the topness if it's gonna rain I would rather it pour. This book will have you on the edge of your seat one minute and in tears the next. Gantz!
6 comments:
Good to see you again in review mode. Animal Man was pretty good eh? I liked Swamp Thing too. You think we could make a C.F. Wonder Man story happen?
Animal Man was cool. Swamp Thing had beautiful art, but I had absolutely no idea what was happening. But my favorite so far is Wonder Woman. Be sure to check it out. It's a genuinely fun read.
Dave
Swamp Thing was a weird one. Just a long conversation about stuff that I thought the reboot cancelled out. But it got great at the end. I picked up Wonder Woman yesterday, it's on the pile. As for CF on Wonder Man or anything, i'll send him a limited edition cassette release with an appeal.
Wonder Woman is great and a bit loopy, although Chiang's art seems a little rushed compared to his Dr 13 stuff. I'd love to see what you think of Catwoman or Red Hood, both were, um, interesting.
Heidi Macdonald has been kind enough to host a Marvelous Coma afterparty over at The Beat, but I thought I would invite everyone over here for a few more after after Cock Tales.....
Brad
09/22/2011 AT 9:49 AM
This is fantastic:
“What I didn’t know 22 years ago but I pretend to know now is that good superhero comics have always been written for adults, but with a simplicity of delivery. You don’t and you can’t write comics for teenagers.”
jacob goddard
09/22/2011 AT 9:53 AM
I would buy Avengers written and drawn by CF in a heartbeat.
Just as soon as he finishes POWR MASTRS
Mikael
09/22/2011 AT 10:49 AM
More high-fiving for the aren’t-we-so-clever crowd. I found nothing great about the review at all.
Synsidar
09/22/2011 AT 11:11 AM
I thought the review was great, although DC let problems stay unsolved for decades. There wasn’t any need to have multiple versions of Superman, Green Lantern, et al. or to rationalize that they existed on parallel Earths. They could have merged the versions by editorial fiat decades ago, or established cutoff points — in the ’70s, for example — and ignored what was written before the cutoff points. The Crises were totally unnecessary as an editorial matter.
Allowing a creator to interpret a character as he wishes — Frank Miller on Batman, for example — is entirely separate from the idea of there being multiple versions of a character. Establishing boundaries that can’t be crossed is pretty easy.
While Marvel’s Ultimates line might have been intended to be an updated version of the M.U., as Chippendale noted, its mission was a failure.
SRS
Justin H.
09/22/2011 AT 11:45 AM
I thought this was a fantastic review, and the shots at the Wonder Man deal in Avengers warmed the cockles of my nearly dead heart.
UPTURNED POLO SHIRT COLLARS ARE THE FUTURE
Chris Hero
09/22/2011 AT 12:02 PM
@jacob goddard
Yes! A million times yes!
Kevin Hynes
09/22/2011 AT 2:55 PM
Agreed with the review. Basically how I saw Justice League:
BATMAN POSE.
GREEN LANTERN POSE.
SUPERMAN I AM, CAN I POSE TOO?!
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.
WE JUSTICE LEAGUE!
JesseBlazeSnider
09/22/2011 AT 5:42 PM
Agree with Mikael.
Too clever is dumb. And this guy does not know WHAT he is talking about on a lot of levels. Grumpy old fan. Just because there are elements of truth to what he is saying does not mean his assumptions are even close to correct.
Zach
09/22/2011 AT 10:16 PM
That’s why I never let my son draw.
Brynocki D
09/22/2011 AT 11:22 PM
ahahah aaa. He’s a grumpy old fan that loves Gantz, The Whale and the new Animal Man relaunch. Those are titles from like the 70’s right? You guys must be big Jim Lee fans, he’s brand new right? How do you high five online? Do I need a Wii for that? Tell me clever guys…
Brynocki E
09/22/2011 AT 11:58 PM
Allrite I had Frankie from Frankie goes to Hollywood come and read over the review and these comments and he thinks that all of it, all our writing taken as one work, gives a total view of the comic landscape and we should be proud.
The Beat
09/23/2011 AT 1:12 AM
Brynocki, don’t ever change.
sam
09/23/2011 AT 10:21 AM
If you don’t like something and explain why, that’s criticism, and most people are OK with that because you can engage with it.
If you don’t like something and just say you don’t like it, that’s a simple statement of opinion, and you can’t really engage with that, but it does no harm.
If you don’t like something and say so, but don’t say why, PLUS you insult the person who made it, that’s just ad hominem. It justifiably invites ridicule.
I thought Animal Man was OK I will keep getting it.
I read 2 issues of Swamp thing and really liked it. i thought the second issue really had some good story points. How they discuss the whole thing with Alec Holland not really being the last Swamp thing is pretty cool. i'll keep going with it.
I actually liked OMAC also. But I'm a sucker for Keith Giffen doing his Kirby impersonation. We'll see how it goes but i don't really have too much hope for it.
I think that's all the DC stuff I got. The main books look horrible.
I'll tell you what one of the best books out there lately is: Avenger- The Children's Crusade.
The story is great and the art is pretty good also. I always thought that Young Avengers was a good book and this is even better. Cool stuff going on with Dr. Doom and The Scarlet Witch. I hope the story wraps up well. Most good Marvel comics end up having terrible endings.
Post a Comment